How politics allies with power to falsify memory and manufacture hegemony
Introduction
There is an evil that does not arise from chaos or impulse, but from planning and the ability to employ tools of political, economic, and media influence to reshape facts and steer human sentiment. This “ingenious” evil is not detached from history; it repeats patterns we saw in the 20th century and revives the essence of Nazism—not in its original hostility toward Jews, but in its method of extermination and domination, this time intersecting with political Zionism. Thus, we witness what can be called a “new Hitlerism” embodied in Benjamin Netanyahu: a blend of absolute power rhetoric, justification of violence, and the crafting of narratives that invert reality in favor of the colonial project.
Historical Memory as a Political Weapon
Since the early centuries of Christianity, Jews were associated in Western consciousness with the crucifixion of Christ—a perception deeply rooted in church texts and popular tradition. Yet political and intellectual transformations in modern Europe, especially after World War II, led to a reconfiguration of this memory.
Historian James Carroll, in his book Constantine’s Sword (2001), argues that reinterpreting the Christian-Jewish relationship after the Holocaust became central to creating an “existential reconciliation” that later rendered criticism of Israel highly sensitive. Thus, Christians shifted from a position of historic antagonism to full alliance, while Muslims were cast as the “new enemy.”
This reversal of narrative was not spontaneous; it resulted from a complex network of media, political, and diplomatic influence, where collective memory of the Holocaust was employed as a moral shield to justify aggressive political practices in Palestine and the region. Researcher Norman Finkelstein, in The Holocaust Industry (2000), explains how Holocaust remembrance was politically and economically instrumentalized, stripped of its purely human dimension.
The New Nazism: Intersection with Zionism
Classical Nazism was built on the myth of racial superiority and hostility toward Jews. The new Nazism we see in Netanyahu’s policies and right-wing Israeli governments rests on the same Hitlerian logic:
-
Contempt for the other and stripping them of their humanity.
-
Justifying murder and genocide as “defense of the nation.”
-
Turning military power into the sole source of legitimacy.
But this time, the victims are not European Jews, but the peoples of the region—from Palestinians to other neighbors threatened by expansionist policies. In this sense, the logic of Nazism and political Zionism converge in their tools of oppression and extermination, even though the former was historically the latter’s enemy. It is a historical paradox revealing that when tyranny and violence are unrestrained by human values, they can become allies even after enmity.
Netanyahu: A Model of New Hitlerism
Netanyahu’s rhetoric of fear, his constant exploitation of security anxieties, and his expansionist policies all reflect the portrait of a leader obsessed with domination. Historian Ian Kershaw, in his study Hitler: A Biography (2008), describes this tendency as a “power obsession” that recognizes no limits and drags the nation toward its own destruction.
Today, Netanyahu repeats the same pattern: elevating weapons over diplomacy, hatred over coexistence, tyranny over pluralism.
Tools of “Ingenious Evil”
-
Global media: The ability to shape the narrative so that aggression appears as “legitimate defense.”
-
Economy and finance: Networks of interests that make criticism of Israel politically and economically costly.
-
Suspended international law: Use of the American veto to block accountability, rendering crimes unpunished.
-
Redefining victim and oppressor: The oppressed Palestinian is portrayed as the aggressor, while the heavily armed occupier is framed as the victim.
Arab and Islamic Alternatives
Confronting this project cannot be achieved by rhetoric alone, but through coherent strategies:
-
Activating the Arab Common Market with a strict timeline, turning economic influence into a tool of resistance.
-
Diversifying arms sources to break dependency on Washington.
-
Pursuing diplomatic and legal efforts through international courts to redefine the narrative globally.
-
Launching professional media campaigns that counter the Zionist narrative with humane and realistic discourse.
-
Building strategic alliances with regional powers such as Turkey and with global powers like China and Russia.
Conclusion
The “new Hitlerism” represented by Netanyahu shows that history reproduces its evils when collective awareness fades and political action fragments. The response, however, should not be reactive hatred, but the construction of a counter-civilizational project—one that balances power with justice, politics with values, and interests with fairness.
History is clear: whoever walks in Hitler’s footsteps, even with a new face, cannot escape the same fate.
