In times when the voice of fire rises above the voice of reason, Egypt — with its historic wisdom and political acumen — continues to hold the threads of balance at a moment when the region teeters between explosion and collapse.
And because I am among those who criticize the way Egypt manages its domestic economic and political affairs — the narrowness of vision in opening the windows of freedom of expression and the imbalance between the powers of the state’s institutions — fairness and national conscience compel me today to speak a word of truth about Egypt’s stance on the Palestinian cause, a position that deserves respect and praise.
The Egyptian leadership has chosen the path of responsible peace — neither submission nor impulsiveness — and its pursuit of an agreement that spares bloodshed and protects civilians on both sides is both a national and humanitarian act.
Egypt did not resort to slogans, nor did it bargain away its principles. Instead, it advanced through calculated steps, guided by a skilled diplomacy and an intelligent security mind, working to bring together parties that are nearly impossible to unite around one table — especially under leaders in Israel, the United States, and Hamas, each capable of igniting a new blaze at any moment.
But the most important and deeply resonant stance in the heart of the Arab nation is Egypt’s categorical rejection of any form of displacement onto its territory.
That rejection was not merely a political decision — it was a historical shield that preserved the essence of the Palestinian cause alive in minds and hearts. It prevented the transformation of the struggle into a new tragedy of refugees that would erase identity and dissolve rights under temporary headlines.
Perhaps Egypt’s refusal of whatever “price” might have been offered to ease its economic hardship reflects the steadfastness of its principles and the leadership’s confidence in overcoming its crises without compromising what is right.
At this delicate moment, Egypt is not only defending its borders, but also the very boundaries of Arab consciousness — defending the right to exist, to dignity, and to identity.
Therefore, it is a national — before moral — duty to commend this role, not out of flattery or distortion, but in acknowledgment of a patriotic act rightly credited to the Egyptian leadership for its wise management of one of the region’s most complex crises.
Criticism, when necessary, is a duty.
And praise, when deserved, is an obligation.
It is only fair to say that this Egyptian diplomatic performance befits the history and stature of the state and reminds us of the role Egypt has always played — as the rational heart of the Arab nation.
And in a crisis like this, Egypt has proven that the voice of wisdom can still be heard… when it speaks from a sincere national heart.
