2026 Collective Activities & ArticlesAl-AzharAll ArticlesBy Dr BadrawiTranslated Articles

The Philosophy of Liberation in the Qur’an Between Taghut and the Firmest Bond By Dr. Hossam Badrawi

Faith, in its linguistic meaning, is belief in something for which there is no tangible scientific proof. In my view, much of what once lacked proof has been scientifically demonstrated over the past two thousand years. The only matter that truly still requires faith today is what comes after death—something we do not know and therefore genuinely requires belief in order to accept and reflect upon.

I perceive the existence of God—Glorified and Exalted—through my scientific and psychological intellect, yet what I perceive is not the anthropomorphized image of God imagined by many.

When the philosopher Ali ibn Abi Talib was asked to describe God, he said:
“I cannot describe Him, for if I described Him I would limit Him; and if I limited Him I would enumerate Him, and He is One.”
For once we limit God, there becomes something outside Him, which negates His absoluteness. Thus, attributing human-like qualities to God—Glorified and Exalted—is a diminution of the truth of His existence.

The Qur’an does not speak of faith as a mere emotional state, nor does it present it as a psychological refuge or a ritualistic practice. Rather, it offers faith as a radical philosophical and moral stance toward the world. Hence one of the Qur’an’s most profound and densely meaningful expressions appears in a single verse that brings together two opposing concepts:

“Whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in God has grasped the firmest bond that will never break.”

This verse does not describe passive belief, but rather a process of conscious liberation followed by a steadfast attachment.


First: What Is Taghut That We Must Reject?

Taghut, at its core, is not a stone idol nor a historical name. It is anything that exceeds its natural limits and claims a right that does not belong to it.

It is any authority—political, ideological, clerical, intellectual, or psychological—that appoints itself as a supreme reference above truth, demanding submission instead of conviction, and obedience instead of awareness.

The Qur’an does not merely describe Taghut; it commands disbelief in it—meaning a cognitive and moral rejection.


Second: Why Does the Path Begin with Disbelief in Taghut?

Because an enslaved mind cannot believe freely. Liberation precedes commitment. The demolition of false authorities must come before construction, so that faith does not become dependency, belief does not turn into a tool of control, and religion itself does not become a new Taghut.

That is why the Qur’an does not say: “Whoever believes in God,” but rather:
“Whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in God.”

The concept of “disbelief” (kufr) has been unjustly confined to hostility toward religion, whereas at its core it is a mirror of freedom.

Whoever disbelieves in oppression, hypocrisy, and tyranny is closer to the spirit of religion than many who merely raise the banner of faith.


Third: What Is the Firmest Bond (Al-‘Urwah Al-Wuthqa)?

The firmest bond is not an abstract idea nor a doctrinal slogan. It is an existential bond that does not break. It is what a person clings to after liberating themselves from all forms of external and internal oppression. It is the covenant between the human being and their Lord.

The firmest bond is a conscious attachment to truth—faith born of free choice and a moral reference that does not shift with interests or fear.

Thus the Qur’an says of it:
“It will never break,”
because it was not built upon illusion, inheritance, or coercion, but upon awareness.


Fourth: The Dialectical Relationship Between the Two Concepts

Taghut and the firmest bond are not separate concepts, but two poles of one equation:

  • Disbelief in Taghut = Liberation

  • Belief in God = Stabilization

  • The Firmest Bond = The outcome of this journey

Whoever clings to the firmest bond without rejecting Taghut clings to an illusion. And whoever rejects Taghut without believing in a higher value falls into nihilism.

The Qur’an does not seek fearful faith or blind obedience. It seeks a human being who is free, conscious, and capable of rejection before acceptance.

Taghut is the negation of freedom.
The firmest bond is its fulfillment.
Between them, the believing human is born—not a follower, but a witness to truth.


Fifth: The Foundations of Belonging in the Qur’an

Surah Al-Baqarah (2:62) presents a clear Qur’anic criterion for belonging to God, far removed from sectarian or ritual classifications:

“Indeed, those who believe, and those who are Jews, Christians, and Sabians—whoever believes in God and the Last Day and does righteous deeds—shall have their reward with their Lord. No fear shall come upon them, nor shall they grieve.”

This verse does not speak of rituals, practices, or formal affiliation. Instead, it establishes three clear pillars for essential belonging to Islam:

The Three Pillars of Belonging in the Qur’an

  • Belief in God as a supreme reference, not merely an inherited conviction

  • Belief in the Last Day, meaning belief in responsibility, meaning, and ultimate justice beyond death

  • Righteous action, as the practical expression of faith, not a decorative slogan

This triad recurs throughout the Qur’an in various forms and represents the minimum requirement for belonging—no more, no less.

Now consider Surah Al-An‘am (verses 151–153), which I consider among the most powerful Qur’anic passages outlining the ethical constitution of Islam:

“Say: Come, I will recite what your Lord has forbidden to you…”
(Verses 151–153)

These verses include commands and prohibitions encompassing monotheism, kindness to parents, prohibition of killing children, avoidance of immorality, prohibition of killing unjustly, safeguarding the orphan’s wealth, justice in measure and speech, and fulfillment of covenants—culminating in adherence to God’s straight path.

These verses form a comprehensive set of commandments safeguarding religion, life, wealth, and human dignity.

Remarkably, these pivotal verses mention neither prayer, fasting, nor pilgrimage, yet the Qur’an presents them as the foundation of obligation, not its branches.

Philosophically, when read as a unified whole, they rest upon three major spheres:

  1. Monotheism and Reference
    “Do not associate anything with Him”—liberating authority from any political, religious, or psychological partner.

  2. Ethics and Social Justice
    Protection of life, care for the vulnerable, justice in word and measure, and fidelity to commitments—righteous action in its broad Qur’anic sense.

  3. Responsibility and Choice
    “We burden no soul beyond its capacity” and “This is My straight path, so follow it.”

Islam, at its core, is a comprehensive ethical path built upon unified reference, justice, protection of humanity, and free moral commitment—aimed at building a responsible, free human being.

Dr. Hossam Badrawi

He is a politician, intellect, and prominent physician. He is the former head of the Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University. He conducted his post graduate studies from 1979 till 1981 in the United States. He was elected as a member of the Egyptian Parliament and chairman of the Education and Scientific Research Committee in the Parliament from 2000 till 2005. As a politician, Dr. Hossam Badrawi was known for his independent stances. His integrity won the consensus of all people from various political trends. During the era of former president Hosni Mubarak he was called The Rationalist in the National Democratic Party NDP because his political calls and demands were consistent to a great extent with calls for political and democratic reform in Egypt. He was against extending the state of emergency and objected to the National Democratic Party's unilateral constitutional amendments during the January 25, 2011 revolution. He played a very important political role when he defended, from the very first beginning of the revolution, the demonstrators' right to call for their demands. He called on the government to listen and respond to their demands. Consequently and due to Dr. Badrawi's popularity, Mubarak appointed him as the NDP Secretary General thus replacing the members of the Bureau of the Commission. During that time, Dr. Badrawi expressed his political opinion to Mubarak that he had to step down. He had to resign from the party after 5 days of his appointment on February 10 when he declared his political disagreement with the political leadership in dealing with the demonstrators who called for handing the power to the Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, from the very first moment his stance was clear by rejecting a religion-based state which he considered as aiming to limit the Egyptians down to one trend. He considered deposed president Mohamed Morsi's decision to bring back the People's Assembly as a reinforcement of the US-supported dictatorship. He was among the first to denounce the incursion of Morsi's authority over the judicial authority, condemning the Brotherhood militias' blockade of the Supreme Constitutional Court. Dr. Hossam supported the Tamarod movement in its beginning and he declared that toppling the Brotherhood was a must and a pressing risk that had to be taken few months prior to the June 30 revolution and confirmed that the army would support the legitimacy given by the people

Related Articles

Back to top button