2026 Collective Activities & ArticlesAlbawabh NewsAll ArticlesBy Dr BadrawiTranslated Articles

Dr. Hossam Badrawi Writes for Al-Bawaba News: Science Opens a Third Eye for Humanity

At this very second, as you read this line, more particles are passing through your body than the total number of human beings who have ever lived on Earth since the dawn of history. They pass through your skin, bones, and heart, then emerge on the other side, continuing their journey through the entire planet as though they had touched nothing at all. You cannot feel them. They do not harm you, and they leave no trace behind. Scientists call them neutrinos; the public calls them “ghost particles.”

This year, the Nobel Prize in Physics went to a man who spent nearly forty years trying to catch these ghosts: Belgian-American scientist Francis Halzen, aged eighty-two, a professor at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. He was recognized for his decisive contributions to establishing the IceCube Neutrino Observatory and for detecting high-energy neutrinos arriving from the depths of the universe.

I want to tell this story in simple language, not because its technical details are unimportant, but because it offers a lesson in imagination, patience, and beauty—qualities I believe we need now more than ever.

A Faithful Messenger That Cannot Be Caught

Almost everything we know about the universe, we have learned through light. But light, for all its beauty, is not an entirely reliable messenger. Cosmic dust can block it, and clouds of gas can absorb it, leaving us with only a glimpse of what happens in the universe’s most violent regions. Other particles arrive from space carrying enormous amounts of energy, but they are electrically charged. Magnetic fields deflect them throughout their long journeys, like a message tossed about by the wind until we can no longer tell which door it came through.

Neutrinos, however, are messengers of an entirely different kind. They carry no electric charge, have an extraordinarily tiny mass, and interact with almost nothing. This is precisely what makes them faithful messengers. A neutrino may emerge from the heart of a stellar explosion or from the vicinity of a supermassive black hole, cross dust clouds, galaxies, and magnetic fields, and reach us millions of years later along an almost straight path, without losing its energy or changing direction. If we can capture one, we can determine where it came from.

And here lies the beautiful paradox: the very property that makes a neutrino a faithful messenger is also what makes it so difficult to catch.

How do you capture something that can cross the entire Earth without colliding with a single atom?

An Idea That Seemed Insane

In 1988, Halzen proposed an idea that many considered closer to fantasy than science. He reasoned that if neutrinos rarely collide with anything, scientists would need to place an enormous amount of matter in their path. If even one neutrino among billions collided with an atomic nucleus, the interaction could produce a faint blue flash of light.

To detect that flash, scientists would need a vast, transparent medium that was completely dark and extraordinarily quiet.

He found the ideal medium in the ice of Antarctica. It had accumulated over thousands of years, was remarkably pure, and had been compressed until its bubbles disappeared. It lay in absolute darkness at depths of around two kilometers, beneath a stable landscape largely free from earthquakes.

Where others saw nothing but a frozen white desert, Halzen saw an eye.

How Do You Build an Eye Out of Ice?

The project began with a smaller experiment, followed by the construction of the much larger observatory. Scientists used hot water to melt the ice and bore dozens of deep holes, lowering 5,160 optical sensors into them. Suspended like beads on a string at depths ranging from 1,450 to 2,450 meters, these sensors transformed a full cubic kilometer of ice into a single enormous eye.

To imagine its scale, picture a cube whose sides are taller than the world’s tallest tower and whose volume could accommodate roughly four hundred pyramids the size of the Great Pyramid of Khufu. Construction was completed in 2011.

Even more remarkable is that this eye does not merely look toward the sky; it can look through the Earth itself. Our planet acts as an enormous filter, blocking most other particles while allowing neutrinos to pass through. When a flash is detected from below, scientists know that the visitor has traveled through the entire planet to reach them.

During the long Antarctic winter, when temperatures plunge below minus 50 degrees Celsius and aircraft cannot land, a small team of people remains isolated there, keeping watch over the observatory and ensuring that its eye stays open.

What Did the Eye See?

Just a few years after operations began, the observatory detected its first neutrinos carrying energies that could not have originated in our atmosphere or in our Sun. The evidence showed that these messengers had come from beyond our Solar System.

Then, in 2017, the observatory detected a single neutrino and automatically issued an alert. Within hours, telescopes around the world turned toward the same point in the sky. They identified a distant galaxy whose central region, dominated by a massive black hole, was directing a jet of matter straight toward us from billions of light-years away.

For the first time, scientists had traced a ghostly messenger back to its home.

Discoveries continued until scientists were able to create an image of our own galaxy, the Milky Way, using neutrinos rather than light—as though humanity had opened a third eye it never knew it possessed.

When the prize was announced, Halzen said he was surprised by the recognition. He emphasized that neutrino astronomy was still in its infancy and that the most exciting discoveries were yet to come. He also expressed the hope that the award would honor the courageous people who had joined him in the early days, when the idea still seemed like a daring gamble.

What Does This Have to Do with Us?

A reader might ask: Why should I care about a particle I cannot see, arriving from a galaxy I will never visit?

I would offer four observations.

First: Imagination comes before instruments.

Halzen did not invent a new material. He looked at something that had existed for thousands of years and saw it in a way no one had seen before. At its heart, science is not about memorizing answers; it is about learning to see familiar things with fresh eyes.

Second: Patience is part of genius.

Twenty-three years passed between the original idea and the observatory’s completion, and thirty-eight years between the idea and the Nobel recognition. In an age when everything is expected to produce immediate results, Halzen reminds us that great achievements take time to mature.

Third: Great science is a collective endeavor.

Hundreds of scientists from dozens of institutions across different countries came together around a single idea. Although the prize bears one man’s name, it also stands as a testament to the power of teamwork.

Fourth: Questions that seem useless are often the ones that build our world.

Electricity, X-rays, and the satellites that guide us through our phones all emerged from the curiosity of scientists who pursued questions that, at the time, offered no obvious practical return.

I confess that, having devoted my life to education, I read this story and find myself thinking about our children. We teach them answers, but rarely teach them wonder. We ask them to memorize laws without telling them that behind every law stood a human being who questioned, dared, and waited.

If we told them a story like this with the passion it deserves, perhaps one of them would grow up to build a new eye for humanity.

Conclusion

The most beautiful thing about this year’s Nobel Prize is the humility it teaches us: what we cannot see does not necessarily fail to exist, and the universe is far larger than what our senses can perceive.

It teaches us hope, too. What our eyes cannot detect may yet be seen by an eye made of ice, created by the human mind at the farthest reaches of the Earth.

By the time you fold this newspaper, trillions of messages from the universe will have passed through you. You will not have read them, and you will not have felt them.

But somewhere, at the bottom of the world, someone has learned how to read them.

Dr. Hossam Badrawi

He is a politician, intellect, and prominent physician. He is the former head of the Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University. He conducted his post graduate studies from 1979 till 1981 in the United States. He was elected as a member of the Egyptian Parliament and chairman of the Education and Scientific Research Committee in the Parliament from 2000 till 2005. As a politician, Dr. Hossam Badrawi was known for his independent stances. His integrity won the consensus of all people from various political trends. During the era of former president Hosni Mubarak he was called The Rationalist in the National Democratic Party NDP because his political calls and demands were consistent to a great extent with calls for political and democratic reform in Egypt. He was against extending the state of emergency and objected to the National Democratic Party's unilateral constitutional amendments during the January 25, 2011 revolution. He played a very important political role when he defended, from the very first beginning of the revolution, the demonstrators' right to call for their demands. He called on the government to listen and respond to their demands. Consequently and due to Dr. Badrawi's popularity, Mubarak appointed him as the NDP Secretary General thus replacing the members of the Bureau of the Commission. During that time, Dr. Badrawi expressed his political opinion to Mubarak that he had to step down. He had to resign from the party after 5 days of his appointment on February 10 when he declared his political disagreement with the political leadership in dealing with the demonstrators who called for handing the power to the Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, from the very first moment his stance was clear by rejecting a religion-based state which he considered as aiming to limit the Egyptians down to one trend. He considered deposed president Mohamed Morsi's decision to bring back the People's Assembly as a reinforcement of the US-supported dictatorship. He was among the first to denounce the incursion of Morsi's authority over the judicial authority, condemning the Brotherhood militias' blockade of the Supreme Constitutional Court. Dr. Hossam supported the Tamarod movement in its beginning and he declared that toppling the Brotherhood was a must and a pressing risk that had to be taken few months prior to the June 30 revolution and confirmed that the army would support the legitimacy given by the people

Related Articles

Back to top button