2025 Collective Activities & ArticlesAll ArticlesBy Dr BadrawiEgyptke WebsiteTranslated Articles

Dr. Hossam Badrawi writes for “Egyptke”: A Philosophical and Social Reading of the Verse: “Woe to every slanderer and backbiter.” (Qur’an 104:1)

“Humazah” refers to harming and belittling people—whether through direct hurtful speech, insulting gestures, or actions that make others feel small, such as attacking someone in their presence or mocking them with signs meant to demean.

“Lumazah” refers to attacking and backbiting others behind their backs—speaking ill of them, ridiculing them in secret, spreading hidden mockery, and tarnishing their reputation without confronting them.

The combination of both terms in the verse indicates completeness: God warns those who combine public harm (humazah) with hidden harm (lumazah), sending a message that corrupt morals—whether visible or concealed—are destructive and unacceptable in human relationships.


1. The Ethical Dimension

The verse draws a clear boundary between freedom of expression and the violation of human dignity. Words and gestures are not merely tools of communication; they can be weapons capable of psychologically and socially destroying a person.

Thus, the Qur’anic warning highlights a profound truth: a person’s worth is rooted in their dignity, and any verbal or moral assault upon it is an aggression deserving of divine condemnation.


2. The Psychological Dimension

  • Humazah (public harm) generates feelings of shame and humiliation in the victim.

  • Lumazah (hidden harm) breeds anxiety, suspicion, and damages self-confidence, as the victim feels their image is being distorted in their absence.

Today, psychology identifies these behaviors as bullying and social shaming, where mockery and backbiting become tools of collective harm. The Qur’an recognized early on the immense psychological impact such behavior has on both individuals and society.


3. The Social Dimension

A society where slander and backbiting spread is a fragmented one. Mutual trust weakens, an atmosphere of suspicion and hostility prevails, and creative potential is marginalized because its bearers are discouraged by ridicule and belittlement.

This image closely resembles what we witness today on social media platforms:

  • Humazah mirrors direct bullying through hurtful comments.

  • Lumazah mirrors hidden mockery in private groups and closed circles.

It is as though the verse warns us against a modern digital world where people devour each other’s dignity.


4. The Philosophical Dimension

The Qur’an does not merely describe a behavior; it ties it to a fundamental existential purpose. Humans were created to be vicegerents on earth, to build and spread mercy.

Humazah and lumazah stand in direct opposition to this purpose, lowering the value of human beings rather than elevating them. Thus, the verse is not only a moral prohibition but also a philosophical declaration: human existence cannot thrive alongside verbal or moral aggression, for it sabotages humanity’s civilizational mission.


5. The Contemporary Lesson

  • In schools and universities, these values can be integrated into anti-bullying programs: the verse becomes a framework showing that bullying is not only a social wrong but also a spiritual offense.

  • In politics and media, it can inspire efforts to combat hate speech and defamation.

  • In raising new generations, it teaches that protecting human dignity comes before any form of humor or non-constructive criticism.

In short, this verse serves as a human mirror, revealing that bullying, mockery, and backbiting are not trivial daily acts—they are existential violations that threaten social cohesion and the dignity of individuals.

Dr. Hossam Badrawi

He is a politician, intellect, and prominent physician. He is the former head of the Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University. He conducted his post graduate studies from 1979 till 1981 in the United States. He was elected as a member of the Egyptian Parliament and chairman of the Education and Scientific Research Committee in the Parliament from 2000 till 2005. As a politician, Dr. Hossam Badrawi was known for his independent stances. His integrity won the consensus of all people from various political trends. During the era of former president Hosni Mubarak he was called The Rationalist in the National Democratic Party NDP because his political calls and demands were consistent to a great extent with calls for political and democratic reform in Egypt. He was against extending the state of emergency and objected to the National Democratic Party's unilateral constitutional amendments during the January 25, 2011 revolution. He played a very important political role when he defended, from the very first beginning of the revolution, the demonstrators' right to call for their demands. He called on the government to listen and respond to their demands. Consequently and due to Dr. Badrawi's popularity, Mubarak appointed him as the NDP Secretary General thus replacing the members of the Bureau of the Commission. During that time, Dr. Badrawi expressed his political opinion to Mubarak that he had to step down. He had to resign from the party after 5 days of his appointment on February 10 when he declared his political disagreement with the political leadership in dealing with the demonstrators who called for handing the power to the Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, from the very first moment his stance was clear by rejecting a religion-based state which he considered as aiming to limit the Egyptians down to one trend. He considered deposed president Mohamed Morsi's decision to bring back the People's Assembly as a reinforcement of the US-supported dictatorship. He was among the first to denounce the incursion of Morsi's authority over the judicial authority, condemning the Brotherhood militias' blockade of the Supreme Constitutional Court. Dr. Hossam supported the Tamarod movement in its beginning and he declared that toppling the Brotherhood was a must and a pressing risk that had to be taken few months prior to the June 30 revolution and confirmed that the army would support the legitimacy given by the people

Related Articles

Back to top button