2025 Collective Activities & ArticlesAll ArticlesBy Dr BadrawiTranslated Articles

Human Values By Hossam Badrawi

At the Café of “Dreamers of Tomorrow”: Human Values

By Hossam Badrawi

Human values are the virtues that guide individuals in their interactions with themselves and with others. They appear naturally in one’s attitudes, often unconsciously, as they become ingrained in one’s being. They influence choices and define behavior.

These values are not purely innate; they also result from social upbringing, beginning at birth and continuing throughout life.

Human values include respect, listening, empathy, affection, appreciation, and love for others. Through these, a person can acquire moral values such as justice, integrity, tolerance, and rejection of violence. Values motivate people to think, speak, and act in certain ways; they are internal standards that set boundaries for behavior.

Human values are categorized into:

  • Individual values: protecting oneself, freedom of choice.

  • Family values: family as the fundamental social unit, preserved through tradition, trust, love, and respect.

  • Professional values: derived from one’s profession, with unique ethical frameworks.

  • National values: ensuring equality and justice for all citizens, rooted in the traditions, history, and experiences of a nation.

  • Moral values: guiding individuals toward respect and love in society.

  • Spiritual values: love, compassion, justice, truth—innate and transcending religion, culture, or nationality, uniting all humanity.

Education, media, culture, and art are the foundations of building moral conscience. Family, school, and society all shape the values we see—or fail to see—in youth.

Children and young people spend about 18 years in educational institutions. Thus, schools and universities are critical for conveying society’s vision of citizenship, belonging, pride in the nation, and respect for women’s rights.

If graduates emerge as narrow-minded, intolerant, violent, extremist, or harassers, then clearly something is wrong in our system.

A young woman at the café told me:
“With all respect, I doubt older generations have a coherent vision or cumulative strategy. My peers and I believe our biggest challenge comes from the confusion in your generation’s ideas. We are the product of your contradictions.”

Her colleague added:
“You and your predecessors confused political, social, and cultural concepts. Are we a modern civil state as some of you claim and as we believe, or a religious state? Do we respect freedom of opinion, women’s rights, pluralism, and tolerance of differences? I doubt your generation has settled these issues.”

I replied: “Instead of endless debate, I agree with you. The real challenge is to find solutions.”

She said: “Then let’s return to education.”

I explained: “Education is not Egyptian, foreign, or religious—it is a universal means of seeking knowledge and skills. What changes is the method, as humanity evolves. With today’s technology and artificial intelligence, knowledge is available to everyone at no cost. The role of education has shifted from transferring information to immersing students in experiences that shape them in both digital and human contexts.”

But even with advanced tools, we may produce geniuses who are also extremists, violent, or harassers. The issue is not only curricula or prohibitions, but the way of life within educational institutions—how students learn to distinguish right from wrong, respect others, and live without violence.

Conscience is shaped by family, media, culture, and art, alongside education. And technology—games, internet, YouTube—exposes children to unlimited information beyond our control. Those who try to resist this wave will fail.

So—is this a crisis or an opportunity?

If we learn to use these tools to nurture tolerance, pluralism, and respect for others, we can leap over long-standing challenges. If we rely only on wishful thinking or traditional rote education, society will drown in contradictions created by ignorance, torn between modernity and fundamentalism, enlightenment and backwardness, science and superstition.

Dr. Hossam Badrawi

He is a politician, intellect, and prominent physician. He is the former head of the Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University. He conducted his post graduate studies from 1979 till 1981 in the United States. He was elected as a member of the Egyptian Parliament and chairman of the Education and Scientific Research Committee in the Parliament from 2000 till 2005. As a politician, Dr. Hossam Badrawi was known for his independent stances. His integrity won the consensus of all people from various political trends. During the era of former president Hosni Mubarak he was called The Rationalist in the National Democratic Party NDP because his political calls and demands were consistent to a great extent with calls for political and democratic reform in Egypt. He was against extending the state of emergency and objected to the National Democratic Party's unilateral constitutional amendments during the January 25, 2011 revolution. He played a very important political role when he defended, from the very first beginning of the revolution, the demonstrators' right to call for their demands. He called on the government to listen and respond to their demands. Consequently and due to Dr. Badrawi's popularity, Mubarak appointed him as the NDP Secretary General thus replacing the members of the Bureau of the Commission. During that time, Dr. Badrawi expressed his political opinion to Mubarak that he had to step down. He had to resign from the party after 5 days of his appointment on February 10 when he declared his political disagreement with the political leadership in dealing with the demonstrators who called for handing the power to the Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, from the very first moment his stance was clear by rejecting a religion-based state which he considered as aiming to limit the Egyptians down to one trend. He considered deposed president Mohamed Morsi's decision to bring back the People's Assembly as a reinforcement of the US-supported dictatorship. He was among the first to denounce the incursion of Morsi's authority over the judicial authority, condemning the Brotherhood militias' blockade of the Supreme Constitutional Court. Dr. Hossam supported the Tamarod movement in its beginning and he declared that toppling the Brotherhood was a must and a pressing risk that had to be taken few months prior to the June 30 revolution and confirmed that the army would support the legitimacy given by the people

Related Articles

Back to top button