2025 Collective Activities & ArticlesAll ArticlesBy Dr BadrawiTranslated Articles

Hossam Badrawi Writes for Al-Hurriya: The New Nazism in the Heart of the Middle East

Hossam Badrawi Writes for Al-Hurriya: The New Nazism in the Heart of the Middle East

The attack on Qatar was not just a military strike but a blatant declaration that Israel has crossed every ethical line, acting as a rogue state—or rather, a gang—that respects neither sovereignty nor law.

This barbaric behavior cannot be separated from the mindset of its leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, who presents himself as the “Hitler of the modern age”: a troubled leader driving his people with delusions of superiority and absolute power toward inevitable isolation and collapse.

Israel Pays the Price

Israel once dreamed of securing its existence through Arab normalization. Instead, it has alienated the Gulf, which once saw Iran as the threat, but now perceives Israel as such.

The strike on Doha was not only against Qatar—it shattered Israel’s attempts at image-building and normalization. Israel has turned from a state “seeking recognition” to a state “condemned” in international forums.

As condemnations mount, Israel’s moral and political capital shrinks toward zero.

What About U.S. Bases?

Let us ask: what is the purpose of American bases in the Gulf? Is it not to defend the region’s security against enemies? Yet Qatar is bombed by Iran’s missiles and Israel’s planes—with U.S. awareness, if not complicity. What, then, is the point of these bases?

Netanyahu and the Obsession with Power

Today, Netanyahu repeats Hitler’s playbook: a leader consumed by illusions of dominance, weaponizing hate and racism, convinced that tanks and planes can grant him eternal legitimacy. He forgets that tyranny breeds isolation, and military might evaporates when confronted with the will of peoples.

With this obsession, Netanyahu drags his country into a dark fate: no security, no stability, only an endless cycle of violence leading to destruction.

Arab and Muslim Options

The real response to Israel is not empty slogans but action. I propose:

  1. Diversify armament: Egypt and the Gulf states should reduce reliance on U.S. weapons and adopt Russian and Chinese technology.

  2. Halt normalization: stop the political tracks that Israel considered its greatest victories.

  3. Diplomatic and legal action: increase Israel’s isolation and prosecute its crimes before the International Court of Justice.

  4. Reform alliances: send a clear message that Israel is not inevitable but can be contained politically and economically.

  5. Launch a professional global media campaign: expose Israel’s neo-Nazi face and ensure Netanyahu’s name is linked to Hitler, not democracy.

  6. Regional alliances: cooperate with Turkey, which will inevitably clash with Israel over Syria.

  7. Exploit U.S.-Israel rifts: expand existing fault lines wisely.

  8. Study Israeli society: work with internal groups opposing Netanyahu’s extremist vision, instead of only reacting to his provocations.

  9. Egypt and Saudi Arabia must align: their joint policies and armies are the backbone of regional security. They must realize that Israel’s ultimate ambition reaches Medina and Sinai after achieving military dominance.

Conclusion

Israel is not the strong victor it pretends to be. It is the most isolated and disgraced entity today. Netanyahu, with his Hitlerian mindset, is leading it into confrontation with its neighbors, international law, and human conscience itself.

If Arabs manage this moment wisely, they will not only respond to aggression against Qatar but reshape the balance, proving that Israel is not beyond accountability—and that those who repeat Hitler’s path face the same end.

🔗 Read on Al-Hurriya News

Dr. Hossam Badrawi

He is a politician, intellect, and prominent physician. He is the former head of the Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University. He conducted his post graduate studies from 1979 till 1981 in the United States. He was elected as a member of the Egyptian Parliament and chairman of the Education and Scientific Research Committee in the Parliament from 2000 till 2005. As a politician, Dr. Hossam Badrawi was known for his independent stances. His integrity won the consensus of all people from various political trends. During the era of former president Hosni Mubarak he was called The Rationalist in the National Democratic Party NDP because his political calls and demands were consistent to a great extent with calls for political and democratic reform in Egypt. He was against extending the state of emergency and objected to the National Democratic Party's unilateral constitutional amendments during the January 25, 2011 revolution. He played a very important political role when he defended, from the very first beginning of the revolution, the demonstrators' right to call for their demands. He called on the government to listen and respond to their demands. Consequently and due to Dr. Badrawi's popularity, Mubarak appointed him as the NDP Secretary General thus replacing the members of the Bureau of the Commission. During that time, Dr. Badrawi expressed his political opinion to Mubarak that he had to step down. He had to resign from the party after 5 days of his appointment on February 10 when he declared his political disagreement with the political leadership in dealing with the demonstrators who called for handing the power to the Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, from the very first moment his stance was clear by rejecting a religion-based state which he considered as aiming to limit the Egyptians down to one trend. He considered deposed president Mohamed Morsi's decision to bring back the People's Assembly as a reinforcement of the US-supported dictatorship. He was among the first to denounce the incursion of Morsi's authority over the judicial authority, condemning the Brotherhood militias' blockade of the Supreme Constitutional Court. Dr. Hossam supported the Tamarod movement in its beginning and he declared that toppling the Brotherhood was a must and a pressing risk that had to be taken few months prior to the June 30 revolution and confirmed that the army would support the legitimacy given by the people

Related Articles

Back to top button