2026 Collective Activities & ArticlesAll ArticlesBy Dr BadrawiEgyptke WebsiteTranslated Articles

Dr. Hossam Badrawi writes for “Egyptke”: Women Between Science, Religion, and Evolution

On the occasion of International Women’s Day, and in response to a question from one of my patients about the relationship between society and women, I said:

In general, in societies where masculine tendencies dominate, the woman is blamed in all cases, even if she is raped or violated.
In private life between man and woman, society regresses when her freedom is violated — through verbal harassment, physical touching, or a degrading view of her body.

Practices such as what they call “purity” — which scientifically is mutilation of the female genital organs without consent — or forcing marriage in childhood, hiding her identity in the name of protection, or depriving her of the right to continue her marital life by abolishing laws that grant her this right — all reflect this regression.

I found myself thinking: what is the link between society and woman except a cultural interdependence, in which there is a collective split personality.
Society glorifies the mother and calls Egypt “Mother of the World,” yet at the same time accuses the woman and violates her rights, even if she is the victim.

The masculine mindset claims that woman was created from Adam’s rib.
To me, Adam may be a name that could refer to a man, a woman, or both.

Returning to science, I see that self-awareness through reason is the greatest human ability.
Religion — especially Islam — urges us to think, search, and learn.

When Darwin proposed evolution over billions of years, the theory collided with religious interpretations held by clergy in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
The same resistance appeared when science proved that Earth is not the center of the universe.

Interpretations are human, not sacred.
Humanity must mature and allow knowledge to accumulate, rather than stopping at the childhood stage of collective thinking.


The philosophical-scientific-religious question

Was the beginning of creation — symbolized in religion by Adam — a complete human formed instantly from clay, as literal interpretations say?

Many people today — including myself — see the story of Adam and Eve as symbolic, and some scholars from different religions share this view.

Scientific evidence shows that genetic diversity in humans is too great to come from only two individuals.

Mitochondrial DNA, inherited only from the mother, traces all humans back to one woman who lived in East Africa about 150,000 years ago — called Mitochondrial Eve.

This suggests humanity may not have descended from only two people.

Genetic diversity requires at least 50 individuals to avoid extinction, and about 500 to avoid genetic drift.
Estimates suggest that early humans needed a population of at least 2,500 individuals to survive.

This agrees with evolutionary theory but conflicts with literal religious interpretations.

The story of Adam and Eve may be symbolic, meaning that humans came from one community.

Compared to the 14-billion-year age of the universe, human existence is less than a second.

We are not even a scene in the film, yet we think the film revolves around us.


Returning to the Egyptian woman

The Egyptian woman is extraordinary — mother, worker, farmer, leader.
When educated, she excels.
When she ruled in ancient Egypt, she led with wisdom.

When she sat on the throne, Hatshepsut ruled for 21 years and made Egypt a great power.

When she sang, she became Umm Kulthum, the Star of the East.

She led airplanes, revolutions, science, medicine, and art.

What protects women from oppression today?

Science.
Knowledge.
Education.

Every family must arm its daughters with knowledge.

To all the women of Egypt…
Your past is civilization,
Your present is strength,
And your future is light.

Dr. Hossam Badrawi

He is a politician, intellect, and prominent physician. He is the former head of the Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University. He conducted his post graduate studies from 1979 till 1981 in the United States. He was elected as a member of the Egyptian Parliament and chairman of the Education and Scientific Research Committee in the Parliament from 2000 till 2005. As a politician, Dr. Hossam Badrawi was known for his independent stances. His integrity won the consensus of all people from various political trends. During the era of former president Hosni Mubarak he was called The Rationalist in the National Democratic Party NDP because his political calls and demands were consistent to a great extent with calls for political and democratic reform in Egypt. He was against extending the state of emergency and objected to the National Democratic Party's unilateral constitutional amendments during the January 25, 2011 revolution. He played a very important political role when he defended, from the very first beginning of the revolution, the demonstrators' right to call for their demands. He called on the government to listen and respond to their demands. Consequently and due to Dr. Badrawi's popularity, Mubarak appointed him as the NDP Secretary General thus replacing the members of the Bureau of the Commission. During that time, Dr. Badrawi expressed his political opinion to Mubarak that he had to step down. He had to resign from the party after 5 days of his appointment on February 10 when he declared his political disagreement with the political leadership in dealing with the demonstrators who called for handing the power to the Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, from the very first moment his stance was clear by rejecting a religion-based state which he considered as aiming to limit the Egyptians down to one trend. He considered deposed president Mohamed Morsi's decision to bring back the People's Assembly as a reinforcement of the US-supported dictatorship. He was among the first to denounce the incursion of Morsi's authority over the judicial authority, condemning the Brotherhood militias' blockade of the Supreme Constitutional Court. Dr. Hossam supported the Tamarod movement in its beginning and he declared that toppling the Brotherhood was a must and a pressing risk that had to be taken few months prior to the June 30 revolution and confirmed that the army would support the legitimacy given by the people

Related Articles

Back to top button